Rason in 2014

Up Next for Changjitu: Hunchun

The Changjitu (Changchun, Jilin city, Tumen) development plan continues to transform Jilin province. The Changjitu economic zone includes Yanbian Korean autonomous prefecture and parts of Changchun and Jilin, two major cities in the province. As we’ve previously argued, the logical end to export-industries in Jilin province is Rason port, with Jilin officials and industrialists looking over the border, waiting for political conditions to be right.

Last year in Yanbian, Yanji city underwent a building boom in anticipation of Wen Jiabao’s visit to commemorate 50 years of Yanbian’s ‘autonomous’ status.  Local ethnic Korean leaders fret that status may be in jeopardy as the region suffers from a brain-drain to not just one, but three metropolitan centers: Seoul, Beijing and Shanghai. The region’s development path will continue regardless of this local political issue, and this year the major construction projects seem to have shifted over to Hunchun, the nearest city to the border crossing into Rason. The familiar Chinese cityscape of a construction crane-forest greets visitors, with retail, industrial and residential projects populating the horizon. As the city grows, more small and medium sized businesses will be just an hour from Rason proper.

Even though it wasn’t the height of tourist season, there were long lines of cars at the border. In town, foreigners (at least some) appear to have more freedom than ever, with no trouble walking freely around town without guides.

Road to China, Train to Russia

The road to the border with China is now completed all the way to the port.

Choo Choo Trains
Choo Choo Trains

On September 22nd, the new Rason-Russia railway link opened. This takes a gauge train line all the way to Rajin port. The rather slow construction over the last several years – not Masikryong speed – can be explained by the complexities of the project, with four dual-gauge tracks along 54 kilometers, 18 bridges, 12 culverts and three tunnels with a combined length of more than 4·5 km. It was completed by a DPRK-Russian JV (Russian Railways Trading Company -70% - and the Port of Rason -30%.), which will continue to run the line. Further development of the port is reported to be underway.

Cranes
Cranes

There are already “concrete plans” to export Mongolian coal via this train line and through Rajin port, though we haven’t heard anything more about the test-runs of Northeastern coal to Chinese ports via Rason..

Power

With Rason’s crumbling electrical infrastructure largely beyond repair, there have been rumors the last two years that the SEZ will be hooked up to Jilin province’s electrical grid. This plan is still not approved, however. Beijing’s Ministry of Commerce is supposedly sitting on it, offering the reason that they are working out proposals for how to construct the lines through protected habitats. Apparently, Siberian Tigers still roam the area, but with perhaps as few as 14 mating pairs in the whole China-Russia border region. China delaying development projects for the sake of environmental concerns doesn’t exactly ring true.

Building Projects

The major mixed-use retail/wholesale/residential projects is yet unfinished, but it is not alone, as several new apartment blocks are being constructed in Rason.  We were told that some of these are Chinese built and would be sold to locals for 200USD per square meter.

Construction in Rajin
Construction in Rajin

Rason-Chilbo Link

Chilbo Mountain has apparently been designated a Special Economic Zone,  with locally issued travel permits for foreigners now possible through Rason. Rason administrators seemed aware of this in theory, but didn’t have experience arranging such travel. Choson Exchange intends to explore this passage next year as we turn to programs focused on SEZ development and management.

Management Structure

Management of the zone seems to have been experimented with fairly often in the last few years. In 2011, there was a great amount of positivity at how much autonomy had been granted the local Economic Cooperation Bureau. In 2012, we were told that Rason had come under the Joint Venture and Investment Commission and that key decisions were made in Pyongyang, though many decisions could be made locally. Now it appears that a Special Economic Zone Bureau has been split off from JVIC and will be managing all special economic zones, including Rason. There is talk of over a dozen, including those already in existence. Which they will choose to focus on and the degree of central control they will exert remains unknown.

Branding

Check out the following excerpt from “Industrial Art of Korea”, an article in this month’s “Foreign Trade”. Much of the text contains standard phrases that are commonly seen in other texts, but the second paragraph contains an interesting nugget:

Industrial art comprises a genre of fine arts that draws a design for making industrial goods and living environment beautiful, convenient and useful. It is represented in close combination of practical aspect with aesthetic one.

Today when production constantly increases along with the rapid development of science and technology, the issue of designing style, shape, colour, brand and package of commodities arises as a more urgent and essential demand.

In the DPRK industrial art has developed on a Juche-oriented stand and in a creative way in line with the socialist mode of life to serve as a powerful means that provides a great stimulus to improvement of the people’s living standards and the building of the independent national economy.

The aforementioned nugget is the concept of branding, the importance of which appears to be dawning on retailers and other businesses in the DPRK.

Marketing is very tough in North Korea, with no platforms for advertising available. TV is not an option, nor is radio. Other than the rare Pyonghwa Motors billboard, there are no ad boards – space that might be given over to advertising in other countries is essentially given over to advertising the fatherland, leadership, policies etc. etc. (This might be the most visually striking thing about visiting Pyongyang. When was the last time you went a day without seeing some product advertised?)

Businesses can have pages on the domestic intranet, Gwangmyong, but options for promotion are limited. This leaves word of mouth, the oldest form of viral marketing.

But as single companies branch out into different product lines or, for example, open shops and restaurants in more than one location, there is need to ensure that customers connect what they do beyond one place. To that end, for the first time in Pyongyang one can see logos cropping up on businesses. Most shops you see still simply call themselves simple “Clothes Shop” or “Vegetable Shop”, but increasing there are visible brands. Or, as one taxi company demonstrates, a unique paint job can act as form of branding. 

We recently held a workshop that introduced the concepts of PR (there isn't even a word for it in North Korea) and brand storytelling, a new but graspable concept. 

In case you’re interested, the Foreign Trade article later states:

The DPRK Trademark, Industrial Design and Geographical Indication Office takes charge of all affairs related to industrial art in the DPRK.

 

The DPRK Trademark, Industrial Design and Geographical Indication Office is promoting exchange and cooperation with WIPO and different countries to render considerable services to economic development of the country and promotion of the well-being of the people.

So that's good.

North Korea Not A "Hermit Kingdom"

While we would quibble with some minor points in this Christian Science Monitor article about our Women in Business program, we think the article makes the good point that North Korea is not as isolated as we think. Some quotes from the article:

“The idea behind all of this,” says Geoffrey See, the founder of the program, “is that we would like to see North Korea integrate with the rest of the world.”

...

It’s also rare that North Koreans, even the elite few that are selected by the government to live in the model city of Pyongyang, are free to leave North Korea – let alone to visit a model economic hub such as Singapore.

Since See founded the group in 2008, workshops in North Korea have grown in frequency. So have overseas programs. In July, 10 young professionals – all women – traveled to Singapore to meet with peers and discuss management and business issues.

...

The culture gap was evident in more than working electricity, food, and the humming economy in Singapore. One woman had particular trouble grasping the concept of a women’s business network. “Is it approved by the government?” she asked in English, struck by the notion that entrepreneurs and managers would associate among themselves without government oversight.

...

Another North Korean, who made sure as many people in the room as possible got her business card, explained at great length North Korea’s attractive investment climate and investor protections. Left unsaid are the practical obstacles in trying to do business in a country where basic communications tools such as the Internet and international phone lines are unavailable to most people, and where there are widespread reports of bribery and corruption...

Today the group and its volunteer trainers make monthly trips to North Korea to organize or hold events, and expect to train some 200 North Koreans this year – double the number trained under the program from 2010, according to the group’s 2012 annual report...

Corporate Socially Responsible North Korea?

On top of the nice piece in the Economist demystifying (or mystifying, depending on your perspective) the workshops we do in North Korea, and blog posts by a workshop leader on the March Women in Business and fiscal policy training, Maaike has now weighed in with her perspectives. Maaike led a workshop for the Women in Business program in August, focusing on Corporate Social Responsibility and Business Ethics. Her workshop brought a new innovation: role-playing, which led to adult participants collapsing into giggles. Her topic also tied in well with another speaker's presentation on the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Some excerpts in her words...

The introduction to CSR and the Western perception of CSR was interesting for them, but as this was my first time teaching in North Korea I had only some ideas of what would be relevant for them to hear, and what to talk about, and based on their reactions I could divert from my topic if necessary. This was much to the frustration of my translator who had to improvise, sometimes would summarize or simply add material if I didn’t explain it well enough, and started asking me questions as well. Topics we all could relate to were; responsibility of the Manager for his/ her employees, a Caring attitude, a safe workplace, etc. . State Owned Enterprises in North Korea have quite good labor laws, their maternity law was better than that of the United States we all agreed. And that was interesting for them; I was a Westerner, teaching them Corporate Social Responsibility, but I would easily take a negative example from the West and tell them what I would think of it; I showed self-criticism and how this works in a training environment. I told them this was a conscious strategy: I wanted them to learn from this self-critical Teaching style, and apply this self-criticism to their own way of thinking and decision making...

The rest of the day I gave them three different Case studies with role plays to work on, it took some time to understand them, but then they greatly enjoyed the material. There was a lot of laughter and giggling going on, because the situations (which I had taken from real life situations from companies I talked to) were unusual to them; they had the opportunity to talk back to a superior, which was a very new situation, and it was a good session.

Sanctions and Dalian

Discussions on the future of the DPRK unavoidably must touch on sanctions. This just as inevitably leads to the question: “but are the Chinese implementing sanctions?” After all, when Chinese trade makes up approximately 70% of North Korea’s trade volume, China is the only country that truly matters in terms of economic influence. On the ground, evidence seems mixed. An interesting anecdote from shippers recently is that China is holding up overseas cargo of non-essential consumer goods at Dalian for extensive checking, leaving some North Koreans to wonder if these goods will be able to reach Pyongyang. Dalian is crucial to international shipping for North Korea: shipment volumes will not be large enough to justify running a route from say, Malaysia, to Nampo so they are sent to Dalian, consolidated and sent on to Korea from there.

While delays have been rumored since early this year post-UNSCR 2087, this is the first time we have heard of goods as mundane as the ubiquitous Pokka canned coffee being “impounded” for being "unnecessary items". Perhaps some crafty trader should hoard the popular Singaporean coffee in North Korea: it is after all synonomous with "iced coffee".

Thus, if the news emanating from Dalian have some truth, it could reflect a central directive to  reduce trade with North Korea from outside. It could also be local bureaucrats or shippers who have recognized that international conditions have become favorable to extract greater rents on the last portion of a product's journey to North Korea.

An interesting question, then, is whether this “impounding” of non-essential consumer goods only affects non-Chinese exporters shipping through Dalian or whether they also impact Chinese exporters to North Korea. Again anecdotally, it does not appear that Chinese businesses are much bothered by recent sanctions. New Chinese taxis have popped up all over Pyongyang in the last few months, and Chinese investors continue to do business at a healthy pace. On the ground, one sees Chinese businesspeople at every level of hotel, from the crappy one we stayed in last week to the swankiest places in town. (No word on how they feel about green tea lattes, though.)

There is also a question of how much impact sanctions on the banking sector have today. When the four main banks of China dropped North Korea’s Foreign Trade Bank as a partner, observers heralded a new age of Chinese support for sanctions. It is questionable how much actual business transactions take place through that channel.

North Koreans adjusted to the “new norm” post-2006 BDA sanctions by setting up systems to conduct banking through informal money transfers. One can easily “wire” money to China by contacting banks in Pyongyang whose agents in China can hand a businessperson his or her cash for a commission below 0.5%. The money can then be deposited in Chinese bank accounts. Again, this "banking" infrastructure benefits Chinese traders disproportionately at the expense of other foreign traders who face more complications and delays in paying their suppliers in their home country.

Bank of China's move in May to close the Foreign Trade Bank's accounts  (an important signal that BoC plays ball, to use the parlance of our times) also serves to drive organizations that were trying to move money through the most official and transparent channel possible into the hands of smaller financial actors. Meanwhile, FTB's 'Narae' debit card is becoming more and more ubiquitous domestically: it is accepted at more and more shops, taxi cabs and now the card can even be linked to one's phone number, allowing mobile cash-free payments to be made between individuals.

A smart Chinese strategy - and indeed, one they appear to be adopting - should involve encouraging sanctions by the international community, while resisting their implementation at home. Chinese businesses are the primary beneficiaries of sanctions as it forces North Korean businesses to rely more on their Chinese partners.

Yo! Cabbie!

So this is what happens when you sit on a blog post. NKnews goes and gets there first. Man, the internet moves fast these days. Anyway... Along with other forms of traffic in the capital, the number of taxis on the road has ballooned in the last few months.

There are now at least three companies competing to fulfill your individual transportation needs, one of which has seen a massive fleet expansion. Brand new Chinese-made BYD small sedans dominate the fleet. Rather than the subtle markings that marked taxis past in Pyongyang, these cars are an unambiguous bright yellow and green, with a larger rooftop sign than other taxis. This makes the fleet an extremely differentiated brand in an autoscape of black, white, grey and military green.

It appears all taxis from three companies now take the increasingly ubiquitous ‘narae card’ as payment so there is no need to fiddle with change – incidentally, the popularity of the narae card is in no small part due to the difficulty retail businesses have in providing hard currency change to customers.

Groups of taxis tend to cluster around the city’s hotels. Fares are usually one US dollar per kilometer, though there appears to be room for negotiation. Visiting foreigners are not yet allowed to ride taxis unaccompanied by a Korean guide. Resident expats are supposedly allowed, though we haven't met anyone who has taken a taxi and moreover, the taxis aren't allowed in the diplomatic compound where most westerners live.

New Fancy Coffeeshop

There is a new chic cafe for Pyongyangers to enjoy.

An espresso cost just over 4 US dollars, while that foul corn syrup nectar, Coca-Cola, was 5 dollars. Pat Bing Su, a shaved ice and red bean summer treat that is popular in all Koreas was almost 10 US, though large enough to share. Green tea lattes are also available for those who think that milk and green tea have too long been kept apart.

The menu also features waffles – called ‘bread sweets’, ice cream and cocktails, some with saucy names such as ‘coconut kiss’ and more innocent sounding names, such as ‘happy birthday’.

The lobby leading to the café also features a truly remarkable picture. So remarkable, in fact, that there is a security officer whose sole station appears to be to prevent people taking snapshots of it. You’ll have to visit to see it, though overall this place can’t be recommended over a visit to the aforementioned Pyongyang Hotel Coffeeshop, still the best game in town.

An Open Letter to Yonhap News

Dear Yonhap, Please do not take statements I've made in written articles, rewrite them, put quotation marks around them and act as if you've interviewed me. I took journalism classes in university. This was under the chapter: "Not Acceptable".

"I have used the account for personal transactions for 20 years but Barclays terminated it without giving proper explanation," he said. 

The facts are not incorrect, but I wouldn't have said 'proper explanation'.

When you wrote:

British banking giant Barclays terminated his account with them without prior notice

That is incorrect. When they tell you they are closing your account, that is 'prior notice'. They say, "we're going to close this account." Then they do it.

I'd like to close these remarks with an interview I've just made up:

Andray: "So, do you feel bad about making stuff up?"

Yonhap: "No, it's fine."

Andray: "I see. Have a nice week."

That is all.

 

Barclays hates Andray

Just like last week, this post originally appeared on Beijing Cream. Why? They get hundreds of thousands of eyeballs per month...  

You know that sound Skype makes, right? Boo-bee-boo-be-boo. Boo-bee-boo-be-boo.

“Hey dad. What’s up?”

“Not much. Where are you?”

“Back in Beijing.”

“There’s a letter here from Barclay’s.”

“Oh yeah? A statement?”

“Hold on… Dear Mr. Abrahamian, we regret to inform you that your account is being terminated…”

“What?! Why?”

“It doesn’t say. It says to call.”

~

Is it weird to have an emotional attachment to a bank account? Opening it 20 years ago was part of my initiation into adulthood. I may have had an undercut, cherry red Doc Martens, and a signature as fluid as a cave painting, but I was passing some sort of rite with my Barclays account. I could draw money from machines all across the country! There was something to put in the card section of my wallet, other than my library card!

Even as Barclays engaged in criminal behavior, I thought this surely wasn’t a reflection on the lovely old ladies (they were probably only 40) who gave me my first traveler’s cheques or accepted my deposits from my first job in the years that followed.

So when I find out from my father, 10,000 kilometers away, that my account has been cancelled, it’s a bit of a shock.

I ring them up and ask what’s going on, though I’m sure I already know.

“OK sir, I’ll just need to take you through some security questions.”

“No problem.” I rattle off the answers – mother’s maiden name, postcode, address. All the same for basically my whole life. Email address? I pause and give the one I think Barclays wants. I have four or five.

“I’m sorry, but you have failed security,” the woman on the other line monotones.

“Wait, it’s the email address, it must be this other one.”

“I’m sorry, but you have failed security,” she monotones. “I cannot discuss this account with you further. You have to go to your nearest branch with two pieces of I.D.”

“Wait, wait, all that information has been the same my whole life, except…”

“I’m sorry, I cannot discuss this account with you further.”

“I’m living in Beijing!” I yell, the pitch of my voice winding up a bit too high. “Where’s my nearest branch?”

“You’ll have to wait until you come back to the UK.”

“Listen, my account is being closed and I need to know what’s going on,” I plead, my own desperation disgusting me a little.

“I won’t tell you again, sir. I cannot discuss this account with you further.”

The condescension in her words breaks something in me. I’ve always prided myself in never getting angry at customer service people over the phone — whatever problem you’re trying to resolve, it isn’t their fault; they’re just doing a job, and not a fun one at that.

That said:

“Fuck this criminal LIBOR-fixing bank!” I yell. “I don’t want to be a part of it!”

I hang up.

It’s a terrible thing to be led around phone menus by a robot, divorcing you from basic human interaction or understanding, but it is far worse when you have a real person on the line for a change, only to find the robots have assimilated them. Resistance may actually be futile.

Despite what she’s told me, I call back a few moments later. I give the other email address, it works, the pleasant lady says, “Oh, you’ve just called.”

Um… yup.

She tells me that unfortunately, after a review, I no longer meet the criteria to have an account at Barclays.

“What are those criteria?” I ask.

“That’s confidential.”

Of course it is. I thank her politely, begin looking forward to joining a Credit Union or whatever it is hippies recommend these days.

I’m not too upset about Barclays’s robot lady stonewalling my inquiry. I already know what happened.

~

It’s because I work for Choson Exchange, a non-profit based in Singapore. We provide training to young North Korean professionals in business, economic policy, and law. We take foreign experts up to Pyongyang for workshops and also bring North Koreans down to Singapore for study trips and internships. We are of the opinion that the more the next generation of North Koreans are exposed to international norms and standards, the better off we will all be in the long run.

North Korea is, of course, under sanctions. The Koreans sometimes like to use the word “embargo,” though that is false. It’s a targeted sanctions regime, with certain products and specific banks and companies on a list.

Educational exchanges are not on that list.

Moreover, Choson Exchange has never conducted a transaction with a North Korean bank. The only money we’ve ever moved in and out of North Korea has been the minimal amounts of cash we take to pay for accommodation, meals, van rental, and other costs when we run our programs. By far the bulk of our operational budget goes to bringing North Koreans out to Singapore.

Two months ago, Choson Exchange tried to pay my salary directly into my Barclays account, and after much hassle the payment was sent back. How did they know who we were? Why were we on their naughty list? I’m not sure, but I called a friend who also works with North Korea, who also had a Barclays account shut down. It made me feel better and confirmed my suspicions. We then spoke to people we knew who work at another bank, who told us it’s probably because our company has “Choson” in it.

“Choson” — or Chosun — is what North Koreans call Korea. Words like “Choson,” “Pyongyang,” “Koryo,” or even “Korea” in a company or organization’s name can apparently get you placed under scrutiny.

Ultimately, through this tale, we can see two of the key effects of sanctions on North Korea.

First, they scare people away. Barclays doesn’t want to take the slightest chance that an account at their bank might be used for anything under sanction. Why go near it? They’ve been in enough trouble recently, they can’t afford another scandal right now. This fear of getting in trouble confronts prospective investors.

Second, sanctions inconvenience. For me, this means opening a new bank account. For North Koreans — even the many engaged in legitimate business — it means moving money around in diplomatic pouches and suitcases, changing company names and paying a premium to smaller, sketchier banks willing to dance around the edges of the rules.

I mean, not that Barclays won’t skirt the rules when it suits them. Last year they agreed to pay $450 million to settle charges of manipulating the LIBOR rate, while criminal charges are going to be filed against several individual employees soon. But they’re too good for my custom.

Oi! Kim Jong Un!

This article originally appeared on the fine Sino-centered blog, Beijing Creamand recounts a curious experience Andray had with a journalist in Pyongyang.

~

“Mr. Kim Jong Un! Channel 4 News, UK!” yelled the journalist at the back of Kim Jong Un’s head.

The Great Marshall stopped. He slowly turned and smiled, his visage a million shining suns. The room, which had been full of raucous cheers, came to a hush. In perfect English he replied, “Yes? How may I help you?”

Just kidding. That last part didn’t happen.

~

Visiting Pyongyang always has an element of surreality. The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea is just such a different way of organizing a society, the last such social experiment of this sort, stubbornly hanging on in contravention of all predictions.

But when visiting, especially for the first time, many things are far more normal than you would expect (which is strange in and of itself), and some things can appear even more depressing. How you process what you see and encounter depends on who you are.

If who you are is a journalist, North Korea basically represents the hardest reporting target in the world. If you’re writing from the outside, you have to plow through acres of rumor and guesswork to try to assess what’s happening. It’s difficult to get into North Korea as a journalist, and if you are accepted, you end up on heavily-managed tours or junkets. If you sneak in on a tourist visa, you generally get to reveal nothing special (thousands of Western tourists go every year), and moreover, you probably harm the interests of whatever company or organization invited you. Take, for example, John Sweeney of the BBC. He snuck in on a London School of Economics trip and made the most unrevealing, contrived hack job of an undercover report you could imagine. Let’s see if LSE gets to bring people in next year.

Certainly, the BBC was absent last week as foreign media were invited to cover the 60th anniversary of the armistice that stopped fighting in the Korean War.

Channel 4 News, however, was there, and it was with its reporter, John Sparks, that I was chatting with in the newly christened war museum one afternoon. They had just finished the opening ceremony, presided over by Kim Jong Un. I thought that because we were allowed to go in so soon after the ceremony meant Kim had already gone out the back. Every other event that week had us arriving long before the man himself, and then we were kept in our seats until he’d left.

But suddenly there was applause and cheers in the hallway next to where we were standing. It could only mean one thing. We quickly darted over, and there he was, with a scrum of people all around, looking frankly quite comfortable with it all. It was such an exciting surprise, it was hard to believe it was happening. Then, at my left shoulder:

“Mr. Kim Jong Un! Channel 4 News, UK! What message are you trying to send to the West?”

To my credit — if I may say so — I turned to Mr. Sparks and asked in that incredulous teenager’s tone: “Really?”

“Well,” he muttered, “if I’d had more time…”

At first I thought I’d made Sparks see the pathetic desperation that characterizes such journalistic “exchanges.” Of course Kim ignored him and moved on, dragging the melee behind him. When I left North Korea, however, I realized that Sparks had actually filed a story titled, Inside North Korea: Channel 4 News questions Kim Jong-un. “Channel 4 News becomes the first news organisation to question leader Kim Jong-un,” reads the subhead. Presumably, “Inside North Korea: Channel 4 News yells at back of Kim Jong-un’s head” was changed by an editor.

Now, I understand that “doorstepping” is an acceptable tool in the modern journalist’s box, even if to me it seems desperate, intrusive, and unilluminating in pretty much all circumstances. (Oooo, look how uncomfortable he looks… must be guilty.) They rarely produce answers, certainly not from sitting heads of state, and certainly not in freaking North Korea*. I mean, Sparks knew he wasn’t going to get an answer.

But looking at his DPRK dispatches, it’s easy to see that actually learning anything about North Korea or attempting some form of illuminating representation was never a part of his agenda.

First, of the encounter, Sparks writes, “He gave me a look but kept on walking.” That is partially true and would have been fully accurate if he had only written, “He kept on walking.”

The video on Channel 4’s site also contains downright disingenuous moments. When describing the military parade, Sparks says, “Not everything was as it seemed. The sound of cheering crowds had been prerecorded, some band members didn’t seem to be playing their instruments, and bits of soldiers’ gear looked suspect, like these plastic-looking grenades.”

Having also been at the parade, I can say that those grenades look fake because they were pinned to the belts of middle school marchers. Channel 4’s shot selection was intentionally misleading. And some band members didn’t appear to be playing their instruments because they played pieces in shifts. It was two hours in the relentless, blazing sun. Have you tried blowing a trumpet for two hours in 33-degree weather with no water? No, you haven’t, because that’s mental. (One musician apparently collapsed afterwards.)

I don’t want to be too hard on John Sparks, though. After all, as the correspondent for all of Asia, he’s got a lot on his plate. As I said, covering North Korea is exceptionally difficult. The problems associated with that country are complex, and TV news is especially poorly suited to covering them. TV is good for explosions and parades, but the conventional sound bites it must trade in just don’t get to the heart of any of North Korea’s problems. It is too easy to just look at the nukes, the weird culture, the failed economy, and call the people zombies or slaves.

(Sparks, by the way, calls his minders “Number 1” and “Number 2,” and writes that after seeing Kim Jong Un brisk by, “They were speechless. I don’t know if it was the fact that I had asked the ‘great marshal’ a question – or because they had found themselves so close to him but they looked stunned.” I talked to other journalists that week who learned their minders’ names and developed good rapport with them — you know, treated them as actual people.)

There are also general professional pressures that make it very hard for news about North Korea to be free of bias. These include a dependence on official sources for information and alignment with the state on foreign affairs, which are exacerbated during wartime. Despite Pyongyang trumpeting their victory (or were they really trumpeting?), the celebrations last week were merely for an armistice. The war, technically — and sometimes kinetically — continues to this day.

North Korea doesn’t help itself by being so secretive. The desire to control all information not only rankles journalists, but creates distortions by forcing a news-hungry world to wade through the muck of rumor and guesswork. This is why we so desperately need more journalists willing to look deeper, do more research, and tell us longer stories with more complicated analyses.

There are a few out there. But don’t go looking for them on Channel 4.

*North Korea nerds: no need to write and tell me Kim Yong Nam is the actual head of state.